Dr. Uche Nworah, Ph.D., a seasoned broadcaster and former Managing Director/CEO of Anambra Broadcasting Service (ABS), in this interview with ISAAC ASABOR shares his expert views on the growing challenges broadcasters face in distinguishing between reality and augmented reality in this interview with ISAAC ASABOR. Nworah emphasises the importance of caution in content curation, especially in an era dominated by artificial intelligence and deep fakes. His responses during the interview, no doubt, threw insights into what broadcasters need to know to maintain credibility in this rapidly evolving landscape.
Excerpts:
Your recent article highlights a significant issue facing broadcasters today. What prompted you to address the gap between reality and augmented reality in the media?
The blurring lines between reality and augmented reality in content production have become increasingly concerning. The rise of artificial intelligence and sophisticated digital tools has made it easier for creators to produce highly convincing, yet entirely fabricated, content. I have seen how these developments impact the credibility of broadcasters, especially when content is lifted directly from social media without proper verification. This issue is too important to ignore, so I felt compelled to address it.
You mentioned the need for broadcasters to adopt a ‘once beaten, twice shy’ approach. Can you elaborate on how this policy could be implemented effectively in newsrooms?
Absolutely, Broadcasters need to establish stringent content verification protocols. This could involve setting up dedicated teams to cross-check any content sourced from social media or other non-traditional outlets. The idea is to ensure that any piece of information or video is thoroughly vetted before it reaches the audience. This policy should be visible in every newsroom as a constant reminder that, in today’s digital age, anything less than thorough verification is risky. Furthermore, regular training sessions for staff on identifying deep fakes and altered content should be mandatory.
With content production costs rising and revenues dwindling, many broadcasters resort to lifting content from the internet. What are the risks associated with this practice, and how can broadcasters mitigate them?
The primary risk is the potential to broadcast fake or altered content, which can severely damage a broadcaster’s credibility. When broadcasters rely heavily on unverified online content, they risk becoming inadvertent purveyors of misinformation. To mitigate this, broadcasters should establish partnerships with trusted content providers and news agencies that are known for their accuracy. Also, investing in digital tools that can help detect deep fakes and other forms of manipulated content is crucial.
You referenced a recent incident where TVC rebroadcasted a skit, believing it to be true. What lessons can other broadcasters learn from this situation?
The TVC incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of due diligence. Broadcasters should never assume the authenticity of content, no matter how credible it appears at first glance. This incident highlights the need for broadcasters to have robust fact-checking mechanisms in place. Additionally, it is essential for broadcasters to issue timely corrections and apologies if an error occurs, to maintain public trust.
You also touched on the monetisation of content by platforms like Meta, which pushes creators to produce boundary-pushing content. How do you think this will influence the future of broadcasting?
The monetisation of content is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it empowers creators to produce more content, but on the other, it incentivises the creation of sensationalised or misleading content designed to go viral. For broadcasters, this means they will need to be even more vigilant. The future of broadcasting will likely involve a blend of traditional journalism ethics with advanced technological tools to separate fact from fiction.
Finally, what advice would you give to broadcasters who are navigating this complex landscape of reality and augmented reality?
My advice is simple: prioritise accuracy over speed. In a world where information travels at lightning speed, the temptation to be the first to break a story is strong, but the consequences of broadcasting false information are far-reaching. Broadcasters should invest in proper training, embrace technology that aids in content verification, and, most importantly, maintain a commitment to journalistic integrity. It’s better to be right than to be first.
Thank you, Dr. Nworah, for sharing your expertise on this crucial topic. It is clear that broadcasters have a challenging road ahead, but with the right strategies, they can successfully navigate these waters.
Thank you for having me. It is a conversation that needs to be ongoing as the media landscape continues to evolve.
Read the full article here
