When Emmanuel Olawale recently tweeted about Ikeja Electric’s refusal to accept his meter, citing its obsolescence and asking him to apply for a new one, it was a familiar tale for many Nigerians.
Across the country, the electricity distribution system remains a source of frustration, despair, and financial strain for consumers, who often bear the brunt ofinefficiency, regulatory lapses, and outright exploitation.
For millions of Nigerians, the dream of reliable electricity remains elusive, despitepromises of reform and privatisation.
Social media is awash with stories of betrayal by distribution companies(DisCos), as evidenced by tweets from exasperated customers.
Take Biola’s experience, for example, she pointed out that some DisCos unfairly place customers in higher tariff bands like Band A, meant for areas enjoying 20 hours of electricity daily, despite providing less thanhalf that amount. The result? Exorbitant bills for substandard services.
Another user, Chiaaondo Benjamin Ikyo, lamented being forced to buy a new meter after his old one stopped working, a situation compounded by delays and poor customer service.
For Ibikunle Olaiya, the frustration deepened when Ikeja Electric billed him on a postpaid plan for months, even after installing a prepaid meter. The story does not end there.
Aliyu Ibrahima accused the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) of enabling DisCos’ exploitative practices.
Others like Zephyr and Omoge Treasure lamented the systemic failures that compel consumers to shoulder costs that should be borne by electricity providers, purchasing poles, wires, meters, and eventransformers.
Behind these tweets lies a painful truth: Nigerian electricity consumers are stuck in a system where they pay more and get less.
Estimated billing remains a thorn in the flesh, with consumers forced to payarbitrary amounts for electricity they never used.
Even prepaid meters, once touted as the solution, have become a tool for fraud, with customers forced to wait for too long, before installation.
The power sector’s woes are not just technical but also regulatory. Despite its mandate, NERC has often been criticised as a toothless bulldog, unable to enforce consumer protection laws effectively. “Bulldogs without teeth,” as one social media user aptly described.
The electricity sector’s privatisation was meant to herald a new era of efficiency, but for many Nigerians, it has only deepenedtheir woes. At the heart of the issue is the lack of accountability. DisCos operate with impunity, while consumers have little to no recourse.
As gathered from Mr. Clement Onyemakonor, “NERC, as the regulatory body, must rise to the occasion. It must enforce stricter compliance with consumer protection rules, penalise errant DisCos, and ensure that customers get value for their money.
DisCos, too, must revisit their customerservice strategies, resolve billing issues promptly, and stop passing operational costs to consumers”.
For Nigerian electricity consumers, the fight for justice is far from over. Social media remains a powerful tool for airing grievances, but real change will require more.
Advocacy groups, consumer protectionagencies, and civil society must amplify these voices, ensuring that reforms are not just promised but delivered.
As the nation struggles with its power crisis, one thing is clear: the electricity sector must prioritize its consumers.
Until then, Nigerians will continue to light their homes with candles, power theirbusinesses with generators, and flood social media with tales of their struggles, a digital testament to a system in desperate need of reform.
Ostensibly reassuring electricity consumers been served by Nigeria’s 11 DisCosoperating across Nigeria’s six geopolitical zones, NERC has through a Statement, and made available on its website fumed as DisCos were accused of violating meter replacement directive amidst electricity consumers’ agony.
The Statement reads:” The Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission is aware that some Distribution Companies (DisCos) have instructed customers to apply and pay for the replacement of faulty and obsolete meters within their franchise areas.
This instruction contravenes the Commission’s Order No. NERC/246/2021 on the Structured Replacement of Faulty and Obsolete end-use Customer Meters in the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry.
“The Order clearly states that no customer with a meter should be forcefully migrated to estimated billing. If any customer’s meter is adjudged by any DisCo to be obsolete or faulty, it is the responsibility of the DisCo to replace the meter free of charge, provided that the fault was not caused by the customer.
“The Commission restates its commitment to protect customers’ interests and rights by ensuring compliance with establishedregulatory standards and enforcing regulatory penalties for non-compliance byits licensees.
“We urge customers to report cases of non-compliance to the Order by any DisCothrough the following channels:”
As understood, NERC in the directive in line with its mandate explicitly stated that DisCos are responsible for replacing faulty or obsolete meters free of charge when the defect is not customer-induced, and that consumers with meters must not be forcibly transitioned to estimated billing systems, a controversial practice widely criticized for its lack of transparency and fairness.
It explains that by sidestepping these directives, some DisCos have put an additional financial strain on customers, many of whom are already grappling with skyrocketing electricity tariffs and erratic power supply.
In fact, reports from aggrieved customers highlight a growing frustration with the apparent disregard for their rights. For instance, some consumers claim that they were compelled to pay for meter replacements or faced punitive estimated billing when their meters malfunctioned.
While NERC has reiterated its commitment to enforcing regulatory standards and penalising errant DisCos, the challenge lies in ensuring that consumers are adequately informed and empowered to report violations.
NERC has provided helplines for customers to lodge complaints about non-compliance, but the effectiveness of this redress mechanism remains to be seen.
The ongoing violations underscore a deeper issue of accountability within the Nigerian electricity supply industry.
DisCos, as licensees of NERC, are obligated to adhere to established guidelines and prioritise customer satisfaction. However, these recent actions paint a different picture, suggesting that profit motives may sometimes take precedence over consumer rights.
.
NERC’s proactive stance is commendable, but enforcement ust go beyond issuing warnings. Stiff penalties and stricter oversight mechanisms are needed to deter non-compliance and foster a consumer-centric approach in the sector.
As also gathered from the Statements, consumers also have a role to play in holding DisCos accountable. By reporting cases of non-compliance through the provided channels of NERC, customers can ensure that their grievances are documented and addressed.
Not only that, awareness campaigns about consumer rights in the electricity sector can further empower individuals to demand fairtreatment.
Mr. Kelvin Njowusi, a consumer enthusiast, in his view said, “The relationship between DisCos and consumers should be anchored on trust, transparency, and adherence to regulatory frameworks.
“The current violations of NERC’s meter replacement directive highlight the urgent need for greater oversight and consumer protection”.
He added that as NERC works to restore compliance, it is essential for all stakeholders to remember that the ultimate goal of Nigeria’s electricity reform is to deliver affordable, reliable, and equitable power to every Nigerian home and business. Anything less is unacceptable.
Read the full article here
